Startups

Elizabeth Holmes’ conviction is a wakeup call for startups and investors

  • 4 min Read
  • January 26, 2022

Author

Escalon

Table of Contents

For one Silicon Valley CEO, it was all fun and games until auditors and The Wall Street Journal uncovered some suspicious numbers. Over the course of 15 years, Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes raised millions of dollars by inflating numbers, misleading investors and hiding the truth about her startup’s star product. 


Theranos showed great promise, at first



At 19 years old, Holmes dropped out of Stanford University to launch her startup. The company had supposedly created highly advanced blood tests and small testing devices that could detect many different diseases and conditions by using only a few drops of blood. That technology would have been revolutionary, significantly reducing the blood required from patients and the costs associated with diagnostic testing.


Within a few years, Theranos landed major, multimillion-dollar contracts with clinics at Walgreens, Safeway and the Cleveland Clinic. Theranos’ blood tests were even used by GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer at one time. As a result of the company’s apparent success, Holmes was able to raise $945 million in capital from investors. 


The truth about Theranos soon came out



By 2015, the whole operation fell apart. Researchers began demanding more concrete evidence that the devices produced accurate test results, as Holmes claimed. When then U.S. Vice President Joe Biden came to tour the facility that year, Holmes and her team even created a fake medical lab to cover up the poor condition of their real facility. By the end of the year, The Wall Street Journal reported that Theranos was actually using traditional blood test machines and attaching those results to tests run by their medical devices.  


In April 2016, Theranos and Holmes came under criminal investigation for misleading their investors, government officials and the general public about the efficacy of their devices. It quickly became clear that Holmes would be made an example to other startups. 


Holmes’ fall is a lesson to other startups

and investors



On January 3, 2022, Elizabeth Holmes was found guilty on four charges of fraud. Her conviction was considered surprising by many. Deceptive fraud cases like this, especially against Silicon Valley CEOs, are rare. Her sentencing in March will determine if she must serve the maximum sentence of 20 years for each count. 


In just a few years, Holmes tumbled from media and med-tech sensation to criminal. And she’s not the only CEO guilty of fudging the numbers. If there’s a lesson to be learned in this story, it’s that the “fake it until you make it” culture prevalent among Silicon Valley startups won’t be tolerated anymore. Agencies are demanding greater transparency and improving their due diligence practices. Meanwhile, investigative journalists are on the lookout for suspicious activity. 


The Securities and Exchange Commission is increasing its scrutiny of startups and mature businesses just like Theranos. Her story is a message to other CEOs and fundraisers tempted to inflate their company’s performance. While these wild exaggerations and predictions have become the norm, misleading investors is a serious crime and government officials are increasingly looking for signs of fraud. 


There’s a lesson in this story for investors too. The investors that poured millions into Holmes’ company did shockingly little research. She found several investors who had no experience in the medical field and were easy to convince. Over time, investors began to take the promising words of other investors as truth, without doing their own due diligence. While Holmes misled the investors, the investors also made it easy for her to paint a positive (and lucrative) picture. 


Key takeaway



Elizabeth Holmes’ story is one that should cause other founders to check themselves. If she can face decades of jail time for her role in the Theranos scheme, governing bodies clearly aren’t giving Silicon Valley a free pass. Greater scrutiny is coming as regulators and investors alike are expecting more transparency and accountability from businesses. An inflated number or two now may help bring in greater capital in fundraising rounds, but the true valuation of your company will eventually come to light. 

Talk to our team today to learn how Escalon can help take your company to the next level.

  • Expertise you can trust

    Our team is made up of seasoned professionals who bring years of industry experience to the table. You gain a trusted advisor who understands your business inside out.

  • Quality and consistency

    Say goodbye to the hassles of hiring, training and managing in-house finance teams. You will never have to worry about unexpected leave of absence or retraining new employees.

  • Scalability and Flexibility

    Whether you’re a small business or a global powerhouse, our solutions scale with your needs. We eliminate inefficiencies, reduce costs and help you focus on growing your business.

Contact Us Today!

Tap into the latest insights from experts in your industry

Accounting & Finance

State Income Tax Nexus 101

You hired your first remote employee in Texas. A sales rep was sent to work out of a co-working space...

Nonprofit

Top Grant Accounting Mistakes Nonprofits Make

Grant funding is the lifeblood of many nonprofit organizations. It fuels programs, sustains operations, and enables the kind of long-term...

Life Sciences

Transfer Pricing Considerations for Life Sciences Companies Expanding Globally  

Global expansion is one of the most exciting milestones a life sciences company can hit. New markets, new clinical partnerships,...

Accounting & Finance

The Role of Accounting Software in Simplifying Audit Prep  

If you have ever spent the weeks before an audit digging through spreadsheets, chasing down receipts, or reconciling accounts that should have...

Taxes

The SMB Owner’s Audit Preparation Timeline: 90 Days Out 

Three months before your audit starts is when you should begin serious preparation, not three days. Yet many business owners...

Taxes

The Cost of Waiting: Why Proactive Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (“VDA”) Filing Almost Always Beats an Audit 

Unaddressed, historical state tax exposure is often an outgrowth of being focused on building a company and not properly keeping track of  an expanding state and local tax footprint. The exposure accumulated as the...

Taxes

R&D Tax Credits for Non-Tech Companies: Are You Missing Out? 

When most business owners hear "R&D tax credit," they immediately think of software companies and biotech firms. This narrow perception costs non-tech businesses billions...

Taxes

5 Business Triggers That Should Prompt an Immediate Nexus Review 

There is a persistent myth in the world of state and local tax compliance that a nexus review is something...

Accounting & Finance

The SaaS Rule of 40: What It Means and How to Achieve It 

If you're running a SaaS business and talking to investors, you've probably heard someone mention the Rule of 40. This simple metric has become a...