Small Businesses

New study gauges the impact of PPP money

  • 4 min Read
  • January 24, 2022

Author

Neha De
Neha De

Neha De is a writer and editor with more than 13 years of experience. She has worked on a variety of genres and platforms, including books, magazine articles, blog posts and website copy. She is passionate about producing clear and concise content that is engaging and informative. In her spare time, Neha enjoys dancing, running and spending time with her family.

Table of Contents

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, a large number of small businesses in the U.S. found themselves in precarious financial situations — their revenue took a deep dive, access to credit was found to be inadequate or absent, and large-scale layoffs and closures took place. 


To help these distressed businesses, Congress enacted the Paycheck Protection Program, which provided uncollateralized, low-interest loans of up to $10 million to businesses with fewer than 500 workers. These loans were forgivable on the stipulation that recipient companies maintained employment and wages at close to pre-crisis levels in the two to six months following loan receipt. 


The scale of the aid provided was so remarkable that by the time the program ended in mid-2021, approximately $800 billion in loans had already been extended. In fact, 93% of small businesses ultimately received one or more loans, and the PPP nearly saturated its market in only two months. 


However, despite the speed of this extraordinary program that helped companies keep their doors open, a new study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that workers were not the main beneficiaries of PPP. 


The economists at NBER found that only $115 billion to $175 billion in PPP loans went toward paychecks — meaning only 23% to 34% of PPP money went directly to employees who would otherwise have lost their jobs. The remaining $335 to $395 billion, or 66% to 77%, went to owners of business and corporate stakeholders, including creditors and suppliers, among others.


The report also revealed that the distribution of PPP loans overwhelmingly accrued to high-income households. Of the $510 billion (the first two tranches) in PPP loans provided in 2020, only $13.2 billion ultimately went to households in the bottom fifth of the income distribution, and that $130.8 billion to the second through fourth quintiles. The remaining $365.9 billion, or 72%, landed up with the top one-fifth of household income. 


The NBER economists wrote in the study that because of the “highly distributionally-skewed incidence of PPP payments,” the government’s two other pandemic-aid programs, namely, enhanced unemployment benefits and Economic Impact Payments (that is, stimulus checks), were spread far more equitably among U.S. households. 


What the NBER economists recommend



The study found that “the primary job retention goal of the Paycheck Protection Program could in the future be better achieved through an expanded program to encourage ‘work-sharing,’ which refers to a policy in which employers, when faced with an economic downturn, are encouraged to reduce hours worked more broadly across the workforce rather than laying off a narrower group outright. In effect, the government program ends up paying partial unemployment to many, rather than full unemployment to some.” 


Currently, there are 26 states in the U.S. that have a work-sharing program through their unemployment insurance systems, but these are not well-subscribed. 


A work-sharing program can target firms of all sizes that are cutting hours or employment, not just small businesses. Additionally, the progressivity of the program could be changed as policy-makers deem appropriate with sufficient administrative capacity developed in normal times. 


A separate liquidity provision program could then be targeted primarily at small businesses, which are more likely to be liquidity-constrained. Moreover, with better information systems operational, liquidity could be offered in proportion to firms’ decline in revenues as well as firms’ actual fixed obligations.


Several other high-income countries responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a mix of job retention incentives, including work-sharing programs that allowed either partial or complete furloughs; and newly introduced wage subsidy programs, similar in many ways to the PPP, which provided firms with direct support for at least some fraction of their wage bill. 


According to the authors of the study, “A key lesson from these cross-national comparisons is that targeted business support systems were feasible and rapidly scalable in other high-income countries because administrative systems for monitoring worker hours and topping up paychecks were already in place, prior to the pandemic. Lacking such systems, the United States chose to administer emergency aid using a fire hose rather than a fire extinguisher, with the predictable consequence that virtually the entire small business sector was doused with money.”

Talk to our team today to learn how Escalon can help take your company to the next level.

  • Expertise you can trust

    Our team is made up of seasoned professionals who bring years of industry experience to the table. You gain a trusted advisor who understands your business inside out.

  • Quality and consistency

    Say goodbye to the hassles of hiring, training and managing in-house finance teams. You will never have to worry about unexpected leave of absence or retraining new employees.

  • Scalability and Flexibility

    Whether you’re a small business or a global powerhouse, our solutions scale with your needs. We eliminate inefficiencies, reduce costs and help you focus on growing your business.

Contact Us Today!

Tap into the latest insights from experts in your industry

Small Businesses

The ROI of Outsourcing Business Services: How to Measure Your Investment’s Impact 

The ROI of Outsourcing Business Services: How to Measure Your Investment’s Impact  In a world where every dollar must count,...

Read More
People Management & HR

2025 Employment Law Updates: What to Know

As we step into 2025, businesses across the country face several important updates in labor laws and employee benefits. Staying...

Read More
Startups

5 Signs Your Startup Needs an Outsourced CFO  

5 Signs Your Startup Needs an Outsourced CFO   Startups often operate with lean teams, but as they grow, financial complexity...

Read More
Leadership & Growth

CG Startups: How to Keep Costs Low While Scaling Operations 

Consumer Goods Startups: How to Keep Costs Low While Scaling Operations  Scaling a consumer goods startup requires a careful balancing...

Read More
Press Releases

Escalon Expands Its Reach: Full Stack Finance and Early Growth Join Forces with Industry Leader 

Escalon Expands Its Reach: Full Stack Finance and Early Growth Join Forces with Industry Leader  In a strategic move that...

Read More
Taxes

Delaware Annual Review: What Series A-C Startups Must Know to Stay Compliant 

Delaware Annual Review: What Series A-C Startups Must Know to Stay Compliant  For startups incorporated in Delaware, staying compliant is...

Read More
Taxes

Tax Planning for Startups: Preparing for Your First Tax Filing

Tax Planning for Startups: Preparing for Your First Tax Filing as a Growing Business  For many startups, the first major...

Read More
Taxes

Unlock Tax Savings with the R&D Tax Credit

As a startup, managing cash flow and minimizing expenses are critical to your business's survival and growth. One often-overlooked opportunity...

Read More
Accounting & Finance

1099 Compliance for Early Stage Startups

1099 Compliance for Early Stage Startups As your startup grows from seed funding to Series A, B, or C, you’ll...

Read More